❖
❖
On February 18, 2026,
President Donald Trump signed
an executive order invoking the ...
❖
On February 18, 2026,
President Donald Trump signed
an executive order invoking the ...
❖
Defense Production Act to prioritize and increase the domestic production of glyphosate and elemental phosphorus. The order identifies these substances, which are key components of the weedkiller Roundup (produced by Bayer-Monsanto), as critical to national security and food security.
Key Aspects of the Executive Order:
Context and Reactions:
The order instructs the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to work with the Department of Defense to ensure a continued supply of these chemicals, despite ongoing safety debates.
Key Aspects of the Executive Order:
- National Security Designation: The order claims that inadequate domestic production of elemental phosphorus and reliance on foreign sources for herbicide production poses an "imminent threat to military readiness".
- Food Supply Impact: Trump argued that glyphosate is essential for efficient, cost-effective agricultural production, and that lack of access would endanger the US food system.
- Immunity/Protection: The order provides limited immunity and support to domestic companies producing glyphosate and phosphorus.
- Controversy: The move drew immediate criticism from environmental groups, the "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) movement, and some health advocates, as glyphosate has been linked to cancer in numerous lawsuits against Bayer/Monsanto.
Context and Reactions:
- Bayer/Monsanto Lawsuits: Bayer is currently facing tens of thousands of lawsuits alleging that glyphosate-based herbicides cause cancer.
- MAHA Reaction: The move is viewed as a reversal of campaign promises by Trump and RFK Jr. to hold chemical companies accountable for health harms.
- Agricultural Support: The order was welcomed by agricultural industry groups, such as the American Farm Bureau Federation, which praised the strengthening of domestic supply chains for farming.
The order instructs the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to work with the Department of Defense to ensure a continued supply of these chemicals, despite ongoing safety debates.
❖
❖
❖
Executive Orders
❖
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE
February 18, 2026.
❖
PROMOTING THE NATIONAL DEFENSE
BY ENSURING AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF
ELEMENTAL PHOSPHORUS
AND
GLYPHOSATE-BASED HERBICIDES
❖
Executive Orders
❖
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE
February 18, 2026.
❖
PROMOTING THE NATIONAL DEFENSE
BY ENSURING AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF
ELEMENTAL PHOSPHORUS
AND
GLYPHOSATE-BASED HERBICIDES
❖
February 18, 2026
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.) (the “Act”), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:
Section 1. Policy and Findings. Elemental phosphorus is pervasive in defense supply chains and is therefore crucial to military readiness and national defense.
It is a key input in smoke, illumination, and incendiary devices and is a critical component for manufacturing the semiconductors that are central to numerous defense technologies, such as radar, solar cells, sensors, and optoelectronics.
It is also increasingly important in modern lithium-ion battery chemistries used in a multitude of weapon-system supply chains.
For these and other reasons, on November 7, 2025, the Department of the Interior, acting pursuant to the Energy Act of 2020, designated phosphate as a critical mineral.
Elemental phosphorus is also a critical precursor element for the production of glyphosate-based herbicides, which play a critical role in maintaining America’s agricultural advantage by enabling farmers to efficiently and cost-effectively produce food and livestock feed.
As the most widely used crop protection tools in United States agriculture, glyphosate-based herbicides are a cornerstone of this Nation’s agricultural productivity and rural economy, allowing United States farmers and ranchers to maintain high yields and low production costs while ensuring that healthy, affordable food options remain within reach for all American families.
There is no direct one-for-one chemical alternative to glyphosate-based herbicides. Lack of access to glyphosate-based herbicides would critically jeopardize agricultural productivity, adding pressure to the domestic food system, and may result in a transition of cropland to other uses due to low productivity.
Given the profit margins growers currently face, any major restrictions in access to glyphosate-based herbicides would result in economic losses for growers and make it untenable for them to meet growing food and feed demands.
Ensuring an adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides is thus crucial to the national security and defense, including food-supply security, which is essential to protecting the health and safety of Americans.
Nonetheless, the United States’ ability to domestically produce those critical inputs is extremely limited. Indeed, there is only a single domestic producer of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides, and this producer does not meet our annual needs for those inputs.
For that reason, more than 6,000,000 kilograms of elemental phosphorus are imported from other countries annually.
Future reduction or the cessation of domestic production of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides would gravely threaten American national security by disrupting, and requiring the further offshoring of, this Nation’s defense supply chain including by having a debilitating impact on domestic agricultural capabilities.
I accordingly find that, consistent with the Department of the Interior’s designation, elemental phosphorus is a scarce material that is critical to national defense and security.
Our Nation’s inadequate elemental phosphorus production, which must sustain both defense manufacturing and our significant agricultural needs, and the threat of increased domestic scarcity leave us vulnerable to hostile foreign actors and pose an imminent threat to military readiness.
Consistent with these findings, I find that ensuring robust domestic elemental phosphorus mining and United States-based production of glyphosate-based herbicides is central to American economic and national security.
Without immediate Federal action, the United States remains inadequately equipped and vulnerable.
Accordingly, I hereby find, pursuant to section 101 of the Act, that domestic elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides meet the criteria specified in section 101(b) of the Act (50 U.S.C. 4511(b)).
Sec. 2. Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides.
(a) Notwithstanding Executive Order 13603 of March 16, 2012 (National Defense Resources Preparedness), the authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act to require performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense, and to implement the
Act in subchapter III of chapter 55 of title 50,
United States Code (50 U.S.C. 4554, 4555, 4556, 4559, 4560), is delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) with respect to ensuring a continued and adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides.
(b) The Secretary shall use the authority under section 101 of the Act (50 U.S.C. 4511), in consultation with the Secretary of War, to determine the proper nationwide priorities and allocation of all the materials, services, and facilities necessary to ensure a continued and adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides.
(c) The Secretary shall issue such orders and adopt and revise appropriate rules and regulations as may be necessary to implement this order.
(d) In exercising the authority delegated in this section, the Secretary shall take into account the President’s judgment that domestic production of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides is critical to the national defense.
Accordingly, the Secretary shall ensure that any order, rule, or regulation issued under this section does not place the corporate viability of any domestic producer of elemental phosphorus or glyphosate-based herbicides at risk.
Sec. 3. Immunity. This order confers all immunity provided for in section 707 of the Act (50 U.S.C. 4557).
Additionally, domestic producers of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides are required to comply with this order, in accordance with the provisions of 7 C.F.R. part 789.
Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
(d) The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of Agriculture.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
February 18, 2026.
- Parent
- Current
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.) (the “Act”), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:
Section 1. Policy and Findings. Elemental phosphorus is pervasive in defense supply chains and is therefore crucial to military readiness and national defense.
It is a key input in smoke, illumination, and incendiary devices and is a critical component for manufacturing the semiconductors that are central to numerous defense technologies, such as radar, solar cells, sensors, and optoelectronics.
It is also increasingly important in modern lithium-ion battery chemistries used in a multitude of weapon-system supply chains.
For these and other reasons, on November 7, 2025, the Department of the Interior, acting pursuant to the Energy Act of 2020, designated phosphate as a critical mineral.
Elemental phosphorus is also a critical precursor element for the production of glyphosate-based herbicides, which play a critical role in maintaining America’s agricultural advantage by enabling farmers to efficiently and cost-effectively produce food and livestock feed.
As the most widely used crop protection tools in United States agriculture, glyphosate-based herbicides are a cornerstone of this Nation’s agricultural productivity and rural economy, allowing United States farmers and ranchers to maintain high yields and low production costs while ensuring that healthy, affordable food options remain within reach for all American families.
There is no direct one-for-one chemical alternative to glyphosate-based herbicides. Lack of access to glyphosate-based herbicides would critically jeopardize agricultural productivity, adding pressure to the domestic food system, and may result in a transition of cropland to other uses due to low productivity.
Given the profit margins growers currently face, any major restrictions in access to glyphosate-based herbicides would result in economic losses for growers and make it untenable for them to meet growing food and feed demands.
Ensuring an adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides is thus crucial to the national security and defense, including food-supply security, which is essential to protecting the health and safety of Americans.
Nonetheless, the United States’ ability to domestically produce those critical inputs is extremely limited. Indeed, there is only a single domestic producer of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides, and this producer does not meet our annual needs for those inputs.
For that reason, more than 6,000,000 kilograms of elemental phosphorus are imported from other countries annually.
Future reduction or the cessation of domestic production of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides would gravely threaten American national security by disrupting, and requiring the further offshoring of, this Nation’s defense supply chain including by having a debilitating impact on domestic agricultural capabilities.
I accordingly find that, consistent with the Department of the Interior’s designation, elemental phosphorus is a scarce material that is critical to national defense and security.
Our Nation’s inadequate elemental phosphorus production, which must sustain both defense manufacturing and our significant agricultural needs, and the threat of increased domestic scarcity leave us vulnerable to hostile foreign actors and pose an imminent threat to military readiness.
Consistent with these findings, I find that ensuring robust domestic elemental phosphorus mining and United States-based production of glyphosate-based herbicides is central to American economic and national security.
Without immediate Federal action, the United States remains inadequately equipped and vulnerable.
Accordingly, I hereby find, pursuant to section 101 of the Act, that domestic elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides meet the criteria specified in section 101(b) of the Act (50 U.S.C. 4511(b)).
Sec. 2. Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides.
(a) Notwithstanding Executive Order 13603 of March 16, 2012 (National Defense Resources Preparedness), the authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act to require performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense, and to implement the
Act in subchapter III of chapter 55 of title 50,
United States Code (50 U.S.C. 4554, 4555, 4556, 4559, 4560), is delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) with respect to ensuring a continued and adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides.
(b) The Secretary shall use the authority under section 101 of the Act (50 U.S.C. 4511), in consultation with the Secretary of War, to determine the proper nationwide priorities and allocation of all the materials, services, and facilities necessary to ensure a continued and adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides.
(c) The Secretary shall issue such orders and adopt and revise appropriate rules and regulations as may be necessary to implement this order.
(d) In exercising the authority delegated in this section, the Secretary shall take into account the President’s judgment that domestic production of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides is critical to the national defense.
Accordingly, the Secretary shall ensure that any order, rule, or regulation issued under this section does not place the corporate viability of any domestic producer of elemental phosphorus or glyphosate-based herbicides at risk.
Sec. 3. Immunity. This order confers all immunity provided for in section 707 of the Act (50 U.S.C. 4557).
Additionally, domestic producers of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides are required to comply with this order, in accordance with the provisions of 7 C.F.R. part 789.
Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
(d) The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of Agriculture.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
February 18, 2026.
❖
❖
Home // Corruption
Trump Becomes the Glyphosate President:
Declares Deadly Weed Killer a National Defense Resource
❖
Natural News.com.
❖
Trump Becomes the Glyphosate President:
Declares Deadly Weed Killer a National Defense Resource
❖
Natural News.com.
❖
02/19/2026 // Mike Adams
Tags: current events, food safety, glyphosate, government, politics, Trump
An Executive Order for Poison:
Trump's Declaration of Chemical Warfare on America
On February 18, 2026, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order that marks a dark turning point in American history, one that weaponizes the nation's food supply against its own people.
Titled "Promoting the National Defense by Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides,"
the order invokes the Defense Production Act to designate the cancer-linked herbicide glyphosate as a "critical resource" for national defense.
This action places a known toxic chemical, the active ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup, under federal protection and prioritization. The order frames this poison as essential to military readiness and food security, claiming glyphosate-based herbicides are a "cornerstone of this Nation’s agricultural productivity and rural economy."
In a stunning reversal of logic, the document asserts that ensuring a supply of this herbicide is "crucial to the national security and defense, including food-supply security, which is essential to protecting the health and safety of Americans." The administration has effectively declared that mass poisoning is a patriotic duty.
Decoding the Order:
How 'National Defense' Justifies Mass Poisoning
The executive order's official language constructs a false crisis to justify an unprecedented assault on public health. It cites the need for elemental phosphorus in military applications like incendiary devices and semiconductors, then seamlessly pivots to glyphosate, arguing it is irreplaceable for agriculture.
The text states, "There is no direct one-for-one chemical alternative to glyphosate-based herbicides. Lack of access to glyphosate-based herbicides would critically jeopardize agricultural productivity."
This creates a fabricated narrative of agricultural collapse without this specific poison.
Crucially, the order reveals America's dangerous dependence on foreign—primarily Chinese—supplies. It admits "more than 6,000,000 kilograms of elemental phosphorus are imported from other countries annually" and that domestic production is extremely limited.
This reliance is framed as a national security vulnerability, with Trump writing that reduction in supply "would gravely threaten American national security." Thus, a chemical dependency born of corporate globalization is used to justify saturating the homeland with toxin.
Perhaps the most alarming component is Section 3, titled "Immunity."
It states, "This order confers all immunity provided for in section 707 of the Act."
While not granting direct corporate legal immunity, this provision, coupled with the national defense designation, creates a powerful legal shield.
It enables Bayer/Monsanto to argue in court that federal authority preempts state-level lawsuits from cancer victims, effectively moving the company closer to the absolute legal immunity enjoyed by the vaccine industry.
As reported by Natural News, the Supreme Court is already poised to hear a case that could grant Bayer such a shield, with the Trump administration's Justice Department siding with the chemical giant [1], [2].
❖
Glyphosate Unmasked:
From Agent Orange Cousin to Chemical Weapon
❖
Glyphosate is not a simple weed killer.
❖
It is an organophosphorus compound, sharing a sinister chemical lineage with Nazi-developed nerve agents like tabun and sarin.
As Carey Gillam details in "Whitewash," the herbicide's history is intertwined with corporate corruption and scientific manipulation [3].
Its chemistry allows it to act as a systemic poison; its small molecular size enables
it to permeate the human body, cross the blood-brain barrier, and circulate within minutes of ingestion.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
has classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen.
It is strongly linked to cancers like non-Hodgkin lymphoma,
a connection affirmed by numerous jury verdicts against Bayer/Monsanto.
Beyond cancer, research highlighted by Children's Health Defense shows exposures to glyphosate and other herbicides are associated with
impaired attention,
memory,
language,
and social perception in adolescents [4].
Farmers use it not just on genetically engineered crops but also as a desiccant—sprayed directly on wheat, oats, and other staples right before harvest to dry them out, leading to direct food contamination.
The Corporate Immunity Playbook:
Repeating the Vaccine Catastrophe
Bayer's strategy mirrors the playbook used by Big Pharma to escape accountability for vaccine injuries.
The company, which purchased Monsanto for $63 billion, is embroiled in tens of thousands of lawsuits from cancer victims. Its current push for a multi-billion-dollar global settlement is a direct attempt to buy permanent legal immunity, a tactic that would grant a "license to kill" similar to the blanket liability protection enjoyed by vaccine manufacturers under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.
This executive order advances that goal by creating a "national security" framework around glyphosate.
It follows the Operation Warp Speed model: declare an emergency, bypass normal safety and regulatory scrutiny, and centralize control.
As reported by The Defender, industry-friendly laws are being floated that would lead to "more chemicals in the food supply and liability protection for chemical makers" [5].
The Trump administration has already taken Bayer's side in pivotal Supreme Court proceedings [6], [7].
By invoking the Defense Production Act and the Secretary of War, Trump is not just protecting a chemical; he is constructing a legal fortress for a corporate defendant, prioritizing Bayer's profits over the lives of American citizens.
The Food Supply as a Battleground:
Chemical Saturation and the End of Safety
The practical effect of this order is a green light for the agricultural industry to massively increase glyphosate use without fear of restriction or consequence.
Farmers, assured of supply and implicit federal endorsement, will be incentivized to spray more liberally. Contamination levels in staple foods, already alarming, are predicted to skyrocket.
A recent Florida state report found glyphosate in popular bread brands at levels up to 191 parts per billion [8].
Post-order, such figures could become the norm rather than the exception. This saturation compromises the entire food safety ecosystem. Organic certification, already vulnerable to wind drift and fraudulent labeling, becomes less reliable.
As I've noted previously, "even then... there's been glyphosate found in organics too because of wind drift or maybe fraud."
The economic reality will hit hardest those who can least afford it: the poor will be trapped in a toxic conventional food system, unable to access clean, tested alternatives.
They will become the primary victims of this state-sanctioned chemical warfare, consuming a poisoned harvest deemed essential for "national defense."
The Only Defense:
Verification, Not Trust
In this new paradigm, trust in government agencies is a lethal error. The USDA, FDA, and EPA have long histories of serving corporate interests over public health.
As detailed by whistleblowers and investigators like Carey Gillam in "The Monsanto Papers," the EPA has repeatedly buried evidence and collaborated with Monsanto to downplay glyphosate's risks [9], [3].
The USDA's pesticide monitoring reports routinely declare residues "safe" despite science to the contrary [10].
Organic labels, while valuable, are not a sufficient guarantee. The only rational response is rigorous, independent verification.
This necessitates third-party, mass-spectrometry testing to detect glyphosate and other contaminants at the parts-per-billion level.
Personal sovereignty over health now demands sourcing food and supplements from suppliers who conduct lot-by-lot, instrument-verified screening for glyphosate, heavy metals, and other toxins.
As I've emphasized in my own laboratory work, "we trust but verify"—a principle that must become a universal standard for survival in the Glyphosate Presidency.
Conclusion:
A Traitorous Betrayal and the Path Forward
Donald Trump's February 18 executive order is a final, traitorous act against the American people.
It represents the full alignment of his administration with the most destructive forces of globalism and depopulation, weaponizing the very food supply under the grotesque banner of "national defense."
This move, coupled with the ongoing push for pharmaceuticals and new Middle East wars, reveals an agenda hostile to human health, liberty, and life itself.
The path forward requires a wholesale rejection of these poisoned systems. Support clean food producers who employ transparent, verified testing.
Decentralize your life by growing your own food where possible. Use uncensored platforms like Brighteon.AI and NaturalNews.com for accurate information.
Speak out against this chemical warfare. This order is a declaration of war on the American body politic. The only appropriate response is organized, informed, and unwavering resistance to protect our health, our freedom, and our future.
HealthRangerStore.com
tests all food, supplements and personal care products for glyphosate, using mass-spec laboratory equipment with ISO-17025 accreditation. If you want clean food, shop at the Health Ranger Store.
References
Tags: current events, food safety, glyphosate, government, politics, Trump
An Executive Order for Poison:
Trump's Declaration of Chemical Warfare on America
On February 18, 2026, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order that marks a dark turning point in American history, one that weaponizes the nation's food supply against its own people.
Titled "Promoting the National Defense by Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides,"
the order invokes the Defense Production Act to designate the cancer-linked herbicide glyphosate as a "critical resource" for national defense.
This action places a known toxic chemical, the active ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup, under federal protection and prioritization. The order frames this poison as essential to military readiness and food security, claiming glyphosate-based herbicides are a "cornerstone of this Nation’s agricultural productivity and rural economy."
In a stunning reversal of logic, the document asserts that ensuring a supply of this herbicide is "crucial to the national security and defense, including food-supply security, which is essential to protecting the health and safety of Americans." The administration has effectively declared that mass poisoning is a patriotic duty.
Decoding the Order:
How 'National Defense' Justifies Mass Poisoning
The executive order's official language constructs a false crisis to justify an unprecedented assault on public health. It cites the need for elemental phosphorus in military applications like incendiary devices and semiconductors, then seamlessly pivots to glyphosate, arguing it is irreplaceable for agriculture.
The text states, "There is no direct one-for-one chemical alternative to glyphosate-based herbicides. Lack of access to glyphosate-based herbicides would critically jeopardize agricultural productivity."
This creates a fabricated narrative of agricultural collapse without this specific poison.
Crucially, the order reveals America's dangerous dependence on foreign—primarily Chinese—supplies. It admits "more than 6,000,000 kilograms of elemental phosphorus are imported from other countries annually" and that domestic production is extremely limited.
This reliance is framed as a national security vulnerability, with Trump writing that reduction in supply "would gravely threaten American national security." Thus, a chemical dependency born of corporate globalization is used to justify saturating the homeland with toxin.
Perhaps the most alarming component is Section 3, titled "Immunity."
It states, "This order confers all immunity provided for in section 707 of the Act."
While not granting direct corporate legal immunity, this provision, coupled with the national defense designation, creates a powerful legal shield.
It enables Bayer/Monsanto to argue in court that federal authority preempts state-level lawsuits from cancer victims, effectively moving the company closer to the absolute legal immunity enjoyed by the vaccine industry.
As reported by Natural News, the Supreme Court is already poised to hear a case that could grant Bayer such a shield, with the Trump administration's Justice Department siding with the chemical giant [1], [2].
❖
Glyphosate Unmasked:
From Agent Orange Cousin to Chemical Weapon
❖
Glyphosate is not a simple weed killer.
❖
It is an organophosphorus compound, sharing a sinister chemical lineage with Nazi-developed nerve agents like tabun and sarin.
As Carey Gillam details in "Whitewash," the herbicide's history is intertwined with corporate corruption and scientific manipulation [3].
Its chemistry allows it to act as a systemic poison; its small molecular size enables
it to permeate the human body, cross the blood-brain barrier, and circulate within minutes of ingestion.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
has classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen.
It is strongly linked to cancers like non-Hodgkin lymphoma,
a connection affirmed by numerous jury verdicts against Bayer/Monsanto.
Beyond cancer, research highlighted by Children's Health Defense shows exposures to glyphosate and other herbicides are associated with
impaired attention,
memory,
language,
and social perception in adolescents [4].
Farmers use it not just on genetically engineered crops but also as a desiccant—sprayed directly on wheat, oats, and other staples right before harvest to dry them out, leading to direct food contamination.
The Corporate Immunity Playbook:
Repeating the Vaccine Catastrophe
Bayer's strategy mirrors the playbook used by Big Pharma to escape accountability for vaccine injuries.
The company, which purchased Monsanto for $63 billion, is embroiled in tens of thousands of lawsuits from cancer victims. Its current push for a multi-billion-dollar global settlement is a direct attempt to buy permanent legal immunity, a tactic that would grant a "license to kill" similar to the blanket liability protection enjoyed by vaccine manufacturers under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.
This executive order advances that goal by creating a "national security" framework around glyphosate.
It follows the Operation Warp Speed model: declare an emergency, bypass normal safety and regulatory scrutiny, and centralize control.
As reported by The Defender, industry-friendly laws are being floated that would lead to "more chemicals in the food supply and liability protection for chemical makers" [5].
The Trump administration has already taken Bayer's side in pivotal Supreme Court proceedings [6], [7].
By invoking the Defense Production Act and the Secretary of War, Trump is not just protecting a chemical; he is constructing a legal fortress for a corporate defendant, prioritizing Bayer's profits over the lives of American citizens.
The Food Supply as a Battleground:
Chemical Saturation and the End of Safety
The practical effect of this order is a green light for the agricultural industry to massively increase glyphosate use without fear of restriction or consequence.
Farmers, assured of supply and implicit federal endorsement, will be incentivized to spray more liberally. Contamination levels in staple foods, already alarming, are predicted to skyrocket.
A recent Florida state report found glyphosate in popular bread brands at levels up to 191 parts per billion [8].
Post-order, such figures could become the norm rather than the exception. This saturation compromises the entire food safety ecosystem. Organic certification, already vulnerable to wind drift and fraudulent labeling, becomes less reliable.
As I've noted previously, "even then... there's been glyphosate found in organics too because of wind drift or maybe fraud."
The economic reality will hit hardest those who can least afford it: the poor will be trapped in a toxic conventional food system, unable to access clean, tested alternatives.
They will become the primary victims of this state-sanctioned chemical warfare, consuming a poisoned harvest deemed essential for "national defense."
The Only Defense:
Verification, Not Trust
In this new paradigm, trust in government agencies is a lethal error. The USDA, FDA, and EPA have long histories of serving corporate interests over public health.
As detailed by whistleblowers and investigators like Carey Gillam in "The Monsanto Papers," the EPA has repeatedly buried evidence and collaborated with Monsanto to downplay glyphosate's risks [9], [3].
The USDA's pesticide monitoring reports routinely declare residues "safe" despite science to the contrary [10].
Organic labels, while valuable, are not a sufficient guarantee. The only rational response is rigorous, independent verification.
This necessitates third-party, mass-spectrometry testing to detect glyphosate and other contaminants at the parts-per-billion level.
Personal sovereignty over health now demands sourcing food and supplements from suppliers who conduct lot-by-lot, instrument-verified screening for glyphosate, heavy metals, and other toxins.
As I've emphasized in my own laboratory work, "we trust but verify"—a principle that must become a universal standard for survival in the Glyphosate Presidency.
Conclusion:
A Traitorous Betrayal and the Path Forward
Donald Trump's February 18 executive order is a final, traitorous act against the American people.
It represents the full alignment of his administration with the most destructive forces of globalism and depopulation, weaponizing the very food supply under the grotesque banner of "national defense."
This move, coupled with the ongoing push for pharmaceuticals and new Middle East wars, reveals an agenda hostile to human health, liberty, and life itself.
The path forward requires a wholesale rejection of these poisoned systems. Support clean food producers who employ transparent, verified testing.
Decentralize your life by growing your own food where possible. Use uncensored platforms like Brighteon.AI and NaturalNews.com for accurate information.
Speak out against this chemical warfare. This order is a declaration of war on the American body politic. The only appropriate response is organized, informed, and unwavering resistance to protect our health, our freedom, and our future.
HealthRangerStore.com
tests all food, supplements and personal care products for glyphosate, using mass-spec laboratory equipment with ISO-17025 accreditation. If you want clean food, shop at the Health Ranger Store.
References
- Supreme Court Poised to Grant Chemical Warfare Immunity: How Glyphosate Legal Shield Would Poison American Justice. - NaturalNews.com.
- Bayer Shares Surge After Supreme Court To Hear Roundup Appeal; Is The Decade-Long Bear Market Over? - ZeroHedge.
- Whitewash: The Story of a Weed Killer, Cancer, and the Corruption of Science. - Carey Gillam.
- A study in Environmental Health Perspectives adolescents with higher urine concentrations of the herbicides glyphosate and 2,4-D scored worse on tests of attention, memory, language and social perception. - ChildrensHealthDefense.org.
- Industry-friendly Laws Could Mean More Chemicals in Food Production — and Trouble for the MAHA Agenda. - ChildrensHealthDefense.org.
- Trump Administration Sides With Bayer In Pesticide Case. - Civil Eats.
- Trump DOJ Sides With Roundup Manufacturer Over Cancer Victims. - CommonDreams.org.
- Shocking Glyphosate Levels in Popular Bread: Florida’s Eye-Opening Food Testing Report. - NaturalNews.com.
- The Monsanto Papers. - Carey Gillam.
- USDA Monitoring Report Declares Pesticide Residues in Food Supply Safe Despite Science to the Contrary. - Beyond Pesticides.
❖
❖
Monsanto Trump declares chemical warfare
on America,
invokes national defense
to expand production of cancer-linked
GLYPHOSATE
❖
02/19/2026
❖
Monsanto Trump declares chemical warfare
on America,
invokes national defense
to expand production of cancer-linked
GLYPHOSATE
❖
02/19/2026
❖
❖
In the spirit of Operation Warp Speed, President Donald Trump is again marshaling the widespread destruction of human health under the guise of a national emergency. Trump signed an executive order declaring the toxic herbicide glyphosate a matter of "national security," expanding production of the infamous carcinogen.
Signed on February 18, 2026, the order invokes the Defense Production Act to prioritize and protect the supply of glyphosate-based herbicides, framing the mass saturation of the food supply with a probable human carcinogen as a patriotic duty essential to military readiness and agricultural productivity.
This directive, crafted in the language of national emergency, represents a direct corporate bailout for Bayer/Monsanto and a calculated act of chemical warfare against the American populace, effectively using the power of the presidency to enshrine mass poison as policy, decimating human health and controlling agricultural functions for decades to come.
Key points:
The executive blueprint for poisoning a nationThe order, titled "Promoting the National Defense by Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides," begins by outlining legitimate military uses for elemental phosphorus in semiconductors and incendiary devices.
It then performs a rhetorical sleight of hand, seamlessly pivoting to glyphosate by claiming it is an irreplaceable "cornerstone" of agriculture. The text asserts that a lack of access would "critically jeopardize agricultural productivity," a claim fabricated by agrochemical marketing departments and wholly divorced from the reality of regenerative farming and organic practices that flourish without this poison.
Most revealing is the document's admission of America's dependency on foreign, primarily Chinese, phosphate imports. This dependency, a result of corporate offshoring and globalization, is now cynically repurposed as a national security vulnerability.
The order states that any reduction in supply "would gravely threaten American national security," thus transforming a corporate-created supply chain weakness into a pretext for mandating the continued poisoning of American soil and food.
The agrichemical industry, having failed to convince legislators to grant it legal immunity for its carcinogenic products, has now successfully lobbied the office of the President to declare their chemicals an issue of national security, bypassing democratic accountability entirely.
From courtroom liability to federal immunity: The corporate shieldPerhaps the most legally dangerous component of the order is Section 3, bluntly titled "Immunity."
It states, "This order confers all immunity provided for in section 707 of the Act." While not an explicit grant of blanket corporate legal immunity, this provision is a strategic masterstroke for Bayer.
Coupled with the "national defense" designation, it constructs a powerful legal fortress. It enables the company to argue in court that federal authority preempts state-level lawsuits, moving it decisively toward the absolute legal protection enjoyed by the vaccine industry under the PREP Act. In other words, Trump sold America out and protected one of the most egregious corporations that cause cancer globally.
The Trump administration has already sided with Bayer in Supreme Court proceedings aimed at shielding the company from liability. As reported by The Defender, industry-friendly laws are being floated to provide "liability protection for chemical makers."
This executive order activates that playbook, using the Defense Production Act and the authority of the Secretary of War to protect a corporate defendant from the consequences of selling a product that causes cancer.
The message is clear: Bayer's profits are now officially prioritized over the lives and health of American citizens, with the full force of the federal government deployed as their private security detail.
The practical outcome is a green light for the unchecked proliferation of glyphosate. Contamination levels in staple foods—already detected in popular bread brands at levels up to 191 parts per billion—will become ubiquitous. The organic label, already vulnerable to fraud and wind drift, will be further compromised.
The economic burden will fall most heavily on the poor, who are systematically trapped in a toxic conventional food system they cannot afford to escape. They are the intended casualties of this policy, consuming a harvest deliberately poisoned under the grotesque banner of "national defense."
Sources include:
Whitehouse.gov. - NaturalNews.com. - Enoch, Brighteon.ai
Note: Organic food will contain this poison!
Either grow it yourself, starve, or be poisoned by the very people you voted for ...
https://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/feb/19/trump-order-protect-weedkiller#:~:text=The%2018%20February%20order%20cites,to%20head%20off%20future%20lawsuits.
Signed on February 18, 2026, the order invokes the Defense Production Act to prioritize and protect the supply of glyphosate-based herbicides, framing the mass saturation of the food supply with a probable human carcinogen as a patriotic duty essential to military readiness and agricultural productivity.
This directive, crafted in the language of national emergency, represents a direct corporate bailout for Bayer/Monsanto and a calculated act of chemical warfare against the American populace, effectively using the power of the presidency to enshrine mass poison as policy, decimating human health and controlling agricultural functions for decades to come.
Key points:
- President Trump's executive order designates glyphosate-based herbicides as a "critical resource" for national defense, requiring federal prioritization of their production.
- The order constructs a false narrative of agricultural collapse without glyphosate, ignoring established science on its dangers and available alternatives.
- A key provision confers legal "immunity" related to the Defense Production Act, creating a shield for Bayer/Monsanto against liability from cancer victims.
- This action follows the playbook of the pharmaceutical industry, seeking to grant chemical corporations the same "license to kill" enjoyed by vaccine manufacturers.
- The order guarantees increased contamination of the food supply, trapping low-income Americans in a toxic food system while undermining organic integrity.
The executive blueprint for poisoning a nationThe order, titled "Promoting the National Defense by Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides," begins by outlining legitimate military uses for elemental phosphorus in semiconductors and incendiary devices.
It then performs a rhetorical sleight of hand, seamlessly pivoting to glyphosate by claiming it is an irreplaceable "cornerstone" of agriculture. The text asserts that a lack of access would "critically jeopardize agricultural productivity," a claim fabricated by agrochemical marketing departments and wholly divorced from the reality of regenerative farming and organic practices that flourish without this poison.
Most revealing is the document's admission of America's dependency on foreign, primarily Chinese, phosphate imports. This dependency, a result of corporate offshoring and globalization, is now cynically repurposed as a national security vulnerability.
The order states that any reduction in supply "would gravely threaten American national security," thus transforming a corporate-created supply chain weakness into a pretext for mandating the continued poisoning of American soil and food.
The agrichemical industry, having failed to convince legislators to grant it legal immunity for its carcinogenic products, has now successfully lobbied the office of the President to declare their chemicals an issue of national security, bypassing democratic accountability entirely.
From courtroom liability to federal immunity: The corporate shieldPerhaps the most legally dangerous component of the order is Section 3, bluntly titled "Immunity."
It states, "This order confers all immunity provided for in section 707 of the Act." While not an explicit grant of blanket corporate legal immunity, this provision is a strategic masterstroke for Bayer.
Coupled with the "national defense" designation, it constructs a powerful legal fortress. It enables the company to argue in court that federal authority preempts state-level lawsuits, moving it decisively toward the absolute legal protection enjoyed by the vaccine industry under the PREP Act. In other words, Trump sold America out and protected one of the most egregious corporations that cause cancer globally.
The Trump administration has already sided with Bayer in Supreme Court proceedings aimed at shielding the company from liability. As reported by The Defender, industry-friendly laws are being floated to provide "liability protection for chemical makers."
This executive order activates that playbook, using the Defense Production Act and the authority of the Secretary of War to protect a corporate defendant from the consequences of selling a product that causes cancer.
The message is clear: Bayer's profits are now officially prioritized over the lives and health of American citizens, with the full force of the federal government deployed as their private security detail.
The practical outcome is a green light for the unchecked proliferation of glyphosate. Contamination levels in staple foods—already detected in popular bread brands at levels up to 191 parts per billion—will become ubiquitous. The organic label, already vulnerable to fraud and wind drift, will be further compromised.
The economic burden will fall most heavily on the poor, who are systematically trapped in a toxic conventional food system they cannot afford to escape. They are the intended casualties of this policy, consuming a harvest deliberately poisoned under the grotesque banner of "national defense."
Sources include:
Whitehouse.gov. - NaturalNews.com. - Enoch, Brighteon.ai
Note: Organic food will contain this poison!
Either grow it yourself, starve, or be poisoned by the very people you voted for ...
https://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/feb/19/trump-order-protect-weedkiller#:~:text=The%2018%20February%20order%20cites,to%20head%20off%20future%20lawsuits.
❖
❖
❖
❖
❖
0:08 / 21:55
They're Putting
'Not For Human Consumption'
on Your Groceries
❖
This Excellent Video
is ONLY
12 Minutes 2O seconds
❖
They are going to put RoundUp in everything ...
RoundUp granules are used as a desecant in most grains and rice...
you directly eat RoundUp ...
❖
0:08 / 21:55
They're Putting
'Not For Human Consumption'
on Your Groceries
❖
This Excellent Video
is ONLY
12 Minutes 2O seconds
❖
They are going to put RoundUp in everything ...
RoundUp granules are used as a desecant in most grains and rice...
you directly eat RoundUp ...
❖
The "Black Box" of the grocery store is here:
in 2026, new labeling laws are forcing Big Food to put warning labels on products containing harmful additives and high sugar.
Learn why food companies are suing to keep you in the dark and how you can shop for "real food" to protect your family's health.
https://DrinkLMNT.com/LillieKane. - https://www.lilliekane.com/coaching
in 2026, new labeling laws are forcing Big Food to put warning labels on products containing harmful additives and high sugar.
Learn why food companies are suing to keep you in the dark and how you can shop for "real food" to protect your family's health.
https://DrinkLMNT.com/LillieKane. - https://www.lilliekane.com/coaching
❖
The Transcript
❖
Warning Labels are Coming to Your Food
❖
You know those scary blackbox warnings0:02
you usually see on heavyduty [music]0:05
prescription drugs? The ones that0:07
basically say, "Pay attention. This0:09
stuff could actually kill you." Well, in0:11
2026, those labels are moving out of the0:15
pharmacy and into your grocery cart. And0:18
once you see what's behind this change,0:20
you're never going to look at a box of0:22
crackers or a healthy granola bar the0:24
same way. If you're new here, my name is0:26
Lily. I'm a certified nutrition health0:29
coach. And y'all, we are in the middle0:31
of like a total health revolution. It is0:34
changing so quickly. I'm having a hard0:36
time keeping up over here. But today, we0:38
are going to cover the three massive0:41
changes happening right now in the food0:43
world. One, the not recommended for0:45
human consumption label, a new labeling0:47
law that is honestly making me laugh. I0:50
think it's hilarious. But for big food0:52
companies, they are furious. They're0:55
literally trying to sue to stop it.0:57
Secondly, we'll cover the global0:58
magnifying glass.
Why Canada and the US1:01
are putting little magnifying glasses on1:03
your food. And lastly, we'll cover the1:05
secret cleanup and lawsuits. How big1:08
food is fighting to keep you in the1:10
dark, meanwhile changing their product1:12
recipes. So whether you're a label1:14
reader or someone who just wants to be1:16
able to buy their food without needing a1:18
chemistry degree, well, these three1:20
changes affect everyone walking into the1:23
grocery store today. And my goal is to1:25
help keep you guys informed with all of1:26
the changes in our food supply and how1:29
to live your healthiest lives. And if1:31
you appreciate this kind of content,1:32
then don't be silly. Subscribe to Lily1:35
and let's jump in. The first big change1:37
is the not recommended for human1:39
consumption label. In 2025, Governor1:42
Abbott signed Senate Bill 25, the Make1:46
Texas Healthy Again act. Now, if you1:48
don't live in Texas, you might be1:50
thinking, "Okay, so what does Texas have1:52
to do with me? I live in Missouri or1:54
someone lives in California. But the1:56
thing is, this law is changing how Big1:59
Food labels their food. And a big food2:02
corporation doesn't want to have to2:04
change just the way a box and a label is2:06
for Texas and then make their boxes all2:09
different for other parts of the2:11
country. Instead, because Texas has such2:13
a massive market, whatever Texas ends up2:17
doing, the rest of the country ends up2:19
getting the benefit. Say, "Thank you,2:21
Texas." Texas could change the way2:23
Americans eat snack foods nationwide,2:25
requiring a warning label on many2:27
popular food and drinks, reading not2:29
recommended for human consumption.2:31
That could impact candies like Skittles2:33
and M&M's, [music] chips, including2:35
Doritos and Ruffles, and drinks like2:36
Gatorade and Mountain Dew.2:38
It's targeting products using2:39
ingredients like bleached flour, food2:41
dyes, sweeteners, oils, and2:43
preservatives. Those are legal and2:45
common in many processed foods in the2:47
US, but some have faced regulation in2:49
other countries. I believe that the rest2:51
of the nation will look to Texas and2:53
say, "Huh, they're on to something."
And2:56
just maybe, we can curb the trend of us2:59
spending more on healthcare than any3:01
other nation in the world. This law3:04
targets 44 specific chemical additives3:06
like red 40, yellow 5, and titanium3:09
dioxide. This law requires a warning3:12
label that says, "Warning, this product3:15
contains an ingredient that is not3:17
recommended for human consumption by3:19
authorities in Australia, Canada, the3:21
EU, or the UK."3:25
I don't know why I find that so funny.3:27
Honestly, I guess it's supposed to be3:28
really sad that they would be3:30
incorporating ingredients in their3:32
products that are naughty, but you know,3:34
I think at this point I got to just find3:36
the humor in it. Most food dyes are made3:38
with synthetic petroleum based3:40
chemicals. They have no nutritional3:42
value and are only used to enhance the3:44
colors of food. Kellogg cereals,3:46
including Froot Loops and Apple Jacks,3:48
contain yellow 6, yellow 5, red 40, and3:51
blue one. According to the Cleveland3:53
Clinic, red 40 can lead to3:54
hyperactivity, including ADHD,3:57
behavioral challenges like irritability3:58
and depression, skin irritation, and4:01
migraines. The other dyes have been4:03
shown to have negative side effects. If4:05
you really think about it, the wording4:07
is so particular. It's not like they're4:09
saying you have to put a label that says4:12
contains artificial food dyes or a label4:15
that says low in nutritional value.4:17
Instead, it's literally a label that4:19
says not recommended for human4:21
consumption. This is what we're calling4:23
the black box of the grocery store.4:26
Traditionally, the black box warning was4:29
reserved for the most dangerous4:31
prescription drugs on the market. But4:33
now that same level of seriousness is4:36
hitting the food aisles. And you know,4:38
sometimes I do wonder if by adding new4:41
labels to packages if it's actually4:43
going to change how people shop and what4:46
they consume, are people really going to4:48
stop buying things like Fruity Pebbles?4:50
I can't help but think that if a mom is4:53
reaching for some fruit snacks for her4:55
kids [music] and sees this warning label4:58
of not recommended for human5:00
consumption, I do think it's going to be5:02
a psychological game changer. I mean, I5:04
know for myself, back when I used to eat5:07
more foods that were ultrarocessed, and5:09
I was struggling with weight gain, acne,5:12
and irregular menstrual cycle, I was5:14
eating foods with these 44 ingredients5:17
every single day because I thought that5:20
if a food was on the shelf, then it was5:22
safe. But this law is now putting the5:25
truth front and center. You can't miss5:27
it. And so I really do hope that these5:30
black boxes are going to start changing5:32
how people shop and what we consume.
The "Magnifying Glass" Law on Food5:35
That brings us to our second topic, the5:37
global magnifying glass front of package5:40
movement. As of January 1st, 2026,5:43
Canada has now officially flipped what's5:46
going on. And now if a food is high in5:50
sugar, saturated fat, or sodium, it now5:53
has to carry a little magnifying glass5:55
on the front. Cereals, drinks, and other5:57
prepackaged foods in Canada's grocery5:59
stores will soon have the symbol of this6:01
black and white magnifying glass. It6:03
signals customers about foods that are6:05
high in fat, high in sugar, or high in6:07
salt. Food companies have until January6:09
1st to apply the front label. It's an6:11
addition to the nutritional value table6:13
that's much easier to read. It's simple,6:16
it's visual, and it interprets the data6:18
for you. And even though this is6:20
happening in Canada at this point, the6:23
Maha movement and RFK Jr. are finalizing6:26
this similar kind of label here in the6:28
US. If a food is high in sugar or6:30
sodium, it will get a symbol on the6:32
front of the package as well. We are6:35
finally treating ultrarocessed foods6:37
with the same caution that we give to6:39
pharmaceuticals. One of the biggest6:41
targets of these new high sugar or high6:44
sodium labels are sports drinks. You6:47
know, the ones that are neon blue and6:50
are basically sugar water with the sight6:52
of red 40. Red 40, the artificial food6:55
dye linked to hyperactivity in children6:58
and banned in other countries. Yeah, I7:01
don't touch any foods, sports drinks or7:04
sodas with artificial food dyes in them.7:07
Instead, I use Element electrolytes,7:09
today's video sponsor. I'm very picky7:12
about what I put into my body. And with7:14
Element, they don't have any of the 447:17
blackbox targeted ingredients. They have7:19
no red 40, no titanium dioxide, no7:22
synthetic preservatives. Instead,7:24
Element is full of sodium, potassium,7:27
and magnesium, which has been a total7:29
gamecher in how hydrated I feel, having7:32
less eye twitching, less cramping,7:35
feeling like I'm just more energized,7:37
and helps prevent those afternoon brain7:39
fogs. And so if you'd like to help7:42
support this channel and try a clean way7:45
to stay hydrated, you can get eight free7:47
packets of Element's most popular7:49
flavors with any order using the link in7:51
the video description, drinkle7:53
element.com/lycane.7:55
They also offer a money back guarantee.7:58
So if you try it and you don't like it,8:00
you can get your money back. My personal8:02
favorite flavors are the watermelon, but8:05
also I like to put the chocolate salt8:07
and the salted caramel salt in my8:09
yogurt, and it's super yummy.
All right,Secret Clean Up & Lawsuits8:11
let's move into the secret cleanup and8:14
lawsuits. Unsurprisingly, Big Food is8:16
losing its literal mind. They are doing8:19
two things. First, they are suing.8:22
They've filed massive federal lawsuits8:24
claiming that by telling you an8:26
ingredient is not for human consumption.8:29
That's a violation of their free speech.8:34
Boy, that escalated quickly.8:37
They're literally fighting for the right8:38
to keep you in the dark. Big food's8:41
argument here is basically we have the8:43
right to put chemicals in your foods8:45
without you feeling scared about it. But8:48
the MA led by RFK Jr. and HHS Secretary8:52
Marty Mackerie, they're saying that the8:54
scare is actually just the truth. For8:58
decades, these companies put the8:59
artificial food dyes and other funky9:02
chemicals they're [music] adding to9:03
their products in tiny font on the back9:06
of their packages. And now the truth is9:08
being dragged to the front. And so the9:10
second thing that big food companies are9:12
doing is they're changing their recipes.9:16
Have you noticed lately some of your9:18
favorite snacks having the label new9:20
recipe or even now made without9:23
artificial food dyes? Introducing9:25
[music] Simply Naked. PepsiCo removing9:27
the artificial dyes from Cheetos and9:30
Doritos, making them totally colorless.9:33
The idea here from the company is that9:35
they are reinventing some of its most9:37
iconic snacks, Doritos and Cheetos, two9:40
[music] types each, and they're9:41
basically removing some of those9:43
artificial dyes and flavors. Yeah.9:45
That's not because these companies care9:47
about your health all of a sudden. It's9:49
regulatory avoidance. These companies9:51
are slowly removing these 44 ingredients9:54
from their recipes so that way they9:57
don't have to put that scary blackbox9:59
warning label on the front of their10:00
package. So, in a weird way, it's kind10:03
of like those blackbox labels are10:05
already working without being fully10:07
implemented.10:08
Kelloggs will stop using the food10:10
colorings by 2027. The company told10:13
straight hour news, "We see the growing10:15
focus on health as an opportunity to10:17
meet consumer needs in even more10:19
meaningful ways. Companies including10:21
Craft Hind, Hershey, Tyson's, and10:23
[music] others have made verbal10:24
commitments." Now, again, not10:27
necessarily because Big Food suddenly10:29
cares about your health, but you know,10:32
either way, it's working and I'll take10:34
it as a win. A lot of people don't know10:36
that Goldfish crackers are 68 years old.10:40
Cool Whip is 60 years old. Doritos chips10:43
are 62 years old. The majority of foods10:46
in the grocery store now that people10:48
think of as normal didn't even exist for10:51
our grandparents. And so for the past 7010:54
years, we've been told that these foods,10:57
they're totally fine. And now we're10:59
finally having some labeling on the11:01
package that is telling the truth. 202611:04
is the year where the food industry11:06
finally has to show their cards. Now,11:09
whether the FDA actually makes these11:11
laws mandatory across the country or11:14
whether the big food industries win11:16
their lawsuits, it really doesn't matter11:18
at this point because the cat is out of11:20
the bag and people are now starting to11:22
ask, "Wait, what is this in my food?"11:25
The blackbox movement isn't about the11:27
government telling you what to eat. It's11:30
about restoring the choice that was11:31
taken away from us for 70 years. But you11:34
know what doesn't get a blackbox warning11:36
label? the ribeye steak, the11:38
pasture-raised eggs, the blueberries.11:41
While big food corporations are trying11:43
to explain why their chemicals are safe11:45
for you and your family to consume, real11:48
food is just being real food. It's just11:50
one ingredient. It doesn't need a label.11:53
It has nothing to hide. We don't need to11:56
have these magnifying glass and black11:58
boxes on real food. Real health is built12:02
by stepping outside the system and just12:04
getting back to the basics. And if you12:07
enjoyed this video, I know you're going12:08
to be curious about how AI is impacting12:11
our food and the food products being12:13
produced. I'll leave that video right12:15
here. Don't be silly.
Subscribe to Lily12:18
and I hope you have a happy day.
❖
❖
Warning Labels are Coming to Your Food
❖
You know those scary blackbox warnings0:02
you usually see on heavyduty [music]0:05
prescription drugs? The ones that0:07
basically say, "Pay attention. This0:09
stuff could actually kill you." Well, in0:11
2026, those labels are moving out of the0:15
pharmacy and into your grocery cart. And0:18
once you see what's behind this change,0:20
you're never going to look at a box of0:22
crackers or a healthy granola bar the0:24
same way. If you're new here, my name is0:26
Lily. I'm a certified nutrition health0:29
coach. And y'all, we are in the middle0:31
of like a total health revolution. It is0:34
changing so quickly. I'm having a hard0:36
time keeping up over here. But today, we0:38
are going to cover the three massive0:41
changes happening right now in the food0:43
world. One, the not recommended for0:45
human consumption label, a new labeling0:47
law that is honestly making me laugh. I0:50
think it's hilarious. But for big food0:52
companies, they are furious. They're0:55
literally trying to sue to stop it.0:57
Secondly, we'll cover the global0:58
magnifying glass.
Why Canada and the US1:01
are putting little magnifying glasses on1:03
your food. And lastly, we'll cover the1:05
secret cleanup and lawsuits. How big1:08
food is fighting to keep you in the1:10
dark, meanwhile changing their product1:12
recipes. So whether you're a label1:14
reader or someone who just wants to be1:16
able to buy their food without needing a1:18
chemistry degree, well, these three1:20
changes affect everyone walking into the1:23
grocery store today. And my goal is to1:25
help keep you guys informed with all of1:26
the changes in our food supply and how1:29
to live your healthiest lives. And if1:31
you appreciate this kind of content,1:32
then don't be silly. Subscribe to Lily1:35
and let's jump in. The first big change1:37
is the not recommended for human1:39
consumption label. In 2025, Governor1:42
Abbott signed Senate Bill 25, the Make1:46
Texas Healthy Again act. Now, if you1:48
don't live in Texas, you might be1:50
thinking, "Okay, so what does Texas have1:52
to do with me? I live in Missouri or1:54
someone lives in California. But the1:56
thing is, this law is changing how Big1:59
Food labels their food. And a big food2:02
corporation doesn't want to have to2:04
change just the way a box and a label is2:06
for Texas and then make their boxes all2:09
different for other parts of the2:11
country. Instead, because Texas has such2:13
a massive market, whatever Texas ends up2:17
doing, the rest of the country ends up2:19
getting the benefit. Say, "Thank you,2:21
Texas." Texas could change the way2:23
Americans eat snack foods nationwide,2:25
requiring a warning label on many2:27
popular food and drinks, reading not2:29
recommended for human consumption.2:31
That could impact candies like Skittles2:33
and M&M's, [music] chips, including2:35
Doritos and Ruffles, and drinks like2:36
Gatorade and Mountain Dew.2:38
It's targeting products using2:39
ingredients like bleached flour, food2:41
dyes, sweeteners, oils, and2:43
preservatives. Those are legal and2:45
common in many processed foods in the2:47
US, but some have faced regulation in2:49
other countries. I believe that the rest2:51
of the nation will look to Texas and2:53
say, "Huh, they're on to something."
And2:56
just maybe, we can curb the trend of us2:59
spending more on healthcare than any3:01
other nation in the world. This law3:04
targets 44 specific chemical additives3:06
like red 40, yellow 5, and titanium3:09
dioxide. This law requires a warning3:12
label that says, "Warning, this product3:15
contains an ingredient that is not3:17
recommended for human consumption by3:19
authorities in Australia, Canada, the3:21
EU, or the UK."3:25
I don't know why I find that so funny.3:27
Honestly, I guess it's supposed to be3:28
really sad that they would be3:30
incorporating ingredients in their3:32
products that are naughty, but you know,3:34
I think at this point I got to just find3:36
the humor in it. Most food dyes are made3:38
with synthetic petroleum based3:40
chemicals. They have no nutritional3:42
value and are only used to enhance the3:44
colors of food. Kellogg cereals,3:46
including Froot Loops and Apple Jacks,3:48
contain yellow 6, yellow 5, red 40, and3:51
blue one. According to the Cleveland3:53
Clinic, red 40 can lead to3:54
hyperactivity, including ADHD,3:57
behavioral challenges like irritability3:58
and depression, skin irritation, and4:01
migraines. The other dyes have been4:03
shown to have negative side effects. If4:05
you really think about it, the wording4:07
is so particular. It's not like they're4:09
saying you have to put a label that says4:12
contains artificial food dyes or a label4:15
that says low in nutritional value.4:17
Instead, it's literally a label that4:19
says not recommended for human4:21
consumption. This is what we're calling4:23
the black box of the grocery store.4:26
Traditionally, the black box warning was4:29
reserved for the most dangerous4:31
prescription drugs on the market. But4:33
now that same level of seriousness is4:36
hitting the food aisles. And you know,4:38
sometimes I do wonder if by adding new4:41
labels to packages if it's actually4:43
going to change how people shop and what4:46
they consume, are people really going to4:48
stop buying things like Fruity Pebbles?4:50
I can't help but think that if a mom is4:53
reaching for some fruit snacks for her4:55
kids [music] and sees this warning label4:58
of not recommended for human5:00
consumption, I do think it's going to be5:02
a psychological game changer. I mean, I5:04
know for myself, back when I used to eat5:07
more foods that were ultrarocessed, and5:09
I was struggling with weight gain, acne,5:12
and irregular menstrual cycle, I was5:14
eating foods with these 44 ingredients5:17
every single day because I thought that5:20
if a food was on the shelf, then it was5:22
safe. But this law is now putting the5:25
truth front and center. You can't miss5:27
it. And so I really do hope that these5:30
black boxes are going to start changing5:32
how people shop and what we consume.
The "Magnifying Glass" Law on Food5:35
That brings us to our second topic, the5:37
global magnifying glass front of package5:40
movement. As of January 1st, 2026,5:43
Canada has now officially flipped what's5:46
going on. And now if a food is high in5:50
sugar, saturated fat, or sodium, it now5:53
has to carry a little magnifying glass5:55
on the front. Cereals, drinks, and other5:57
prepackaged foods in Canada's grocery5:59
stores will soon have the symbol of this6:01
black and white magnifying glass. It6:03
signals customers about foods that are6:05
high in fat, high in sugar, or high in6:07
salt. Food companies have until January6:09
1st to apply the front label. It's an6:11
addition to the nutritional value table6:13
that's much easier to read. It's simple,6:16
it's visual, and it interprets the data6:18
for you. And even though this is6:20
happening in Canada at this point, the6:23
Maha movement and RFK Jr. are finalizing6:26
this similar kind of label here in the6:28
US. If a food is high in sugar or6:30
sodium, it will get a symbol on the6:32
front of the package as well. We are6:35
finally treating ultrarocessed foods6:37
with the same caution that we give to6:39
pharmaceuticals. One of the biggest6:41
targets of these new high sugar or high6:44
sodium labels are sports drinks. You6:47
know, the ones that are neon blue and6:50
are basically sugar water with the sight6:52
of red 40. Red 40, the artificial food6:55
dye linked to hyperactivity in children6:58
and banned in other countries. Yeah, I7:01
don't touch any foods, sports drinks or7:04
sodas with artificial food dyes in them.7:07
Instead, I use Element electrolytes,7:09
today's video sponsor. I'm very picky7:12
about what I put into my body. And with7:14
Element, they don't have any of the 447:17
blackbox targeted ingredients. They have7:19
no red 40, no titanium dioxide, no7:22
synthetic preservatives. Instead,7:24
Element is full of sodium, potassium,7:27
and magnesium, which has been a total7:29
gamecher in how hydrated I feel, having7:32
less eye twitching, less cramping,7:35
feeling like I'm just more energized,7:37
and helps prevent those afternoon brain7:39
fogs. And so if you'd like to help7:42
support this channel and try a clean way7:45
to stay hydrated, you can get eight free7:47
packets of Element's most popular7:49
flavors with any order using the link in7:51
the video description, drinkle7:53
element.com/lycane.7:55
They also offer a money back guarantee.7:58
So if you try it and you don't like it,8:00
you can get your money back. My personal8:02
favorite flavors are the watermelon, but8:05
also I like to put the chocolate salt8:07
and the salted caramel salt in my8:09
yogurt, and it's super yummy.
All right,Secret Clean Up & Lawsuits8:11
let's move into the secret cleanup and8:14
lawsuits. Unsurprisingly, Big Food is8:16
losing its literal mind. They are doing8:19
two things. First, they are suing.8:22
They've filed massive federal lawsuits8:24
claiming that by telling you an8:26
ingredient is not for human consumption.8:29
That's a violation of their free speech.8:34
Boy, that escalated quickly.8:37
They're literally fighting for the right8:38
to keep you in the dark. Big food's8:41
argument here is basically we have the8:43
right to put chemicals in your foods8:45
without you feeling scared about it. But8:48
the MA led by RFK Jr. and HHS Secretary8:52
Marty Mackerie, they're saying that the8:54
scare is actually just the truth. For8:58
decades, these companies put the8:59
artificial food dyes and other funky9:02
chemicals they're [music] adding to9:03
their products in tiny font on the back9:06
of their packages. And now the truth is9:08
being dragged to the front. And so the9:10
second thing that big food companies are9:12
doing is they're changing their recipes.9:16
Have you noticed lately some of your9:18
favorite snacks having the label new9:20
recipe or even now made without9:23
artificial food dyes? Introducing9:25
[music] Simply Naked. PepsiCo removing9:27
the artificial dyes from Cheetos and9:30
Doritos, making them totally colorless.9:33
The idea here from the company is that9:35
they are reinventing some of its most9:37
iconic snacks, Doritos and Cheetos, two9:40
[music] types each, and they're9:41
basically removing some of those9:43
artificial dyes and flavors. Yeah.9:45
That's not because these companies care9:47
about your health all of a sudden. It's9:49
regulatory avoidance. These companies9:51
are slowly removing these 44 ingredients9:54
from their recipes so that way they9:57
don't have to put that scary blackbox9:59
warning label on the front of their10:00
package. So, in a weird way, it's kind10:03
of like those blackbox labels are10:05
already working without being fully10:07
implemented.10:08
Kelloggs will stop using the food10:10
colorings by 2027. The company told10:13
straight hour news, "We see the growing10:15
focus on health as an opportunity to10:17
meet consumer needs in even more10:19
meaningful ways. Companies including10:21
Craft Hind, Hershey, Tyson's, and10:23
[music] others have made verbal10:24
commitments." Now, again, not10:27
necessarily because Big Food suddenly10:29
cares about your health, but you know,10:32
either way, it's working and I'll take10:34
it as a win. A lot of people don't know10:36
that Goldfish crackers are 68 years old.10:40
Cool Whip is 60 years old. Doritos chips10:43
are 62 years old. The majority of foods10:46
in the grocery store now that people10:48
think of as normal didn't even exist for10:51
our grandparents. And so for the past 7010:54
years, we've been told that these foods,10:57
they're totally fine. And now we're10:59
finally having some labeling on the11:01
package that is telling the truth. 202611:04
is the year where the food industry11:06
finally has to show their cards. Now,11:09
whether the FDA actually makes these11:11
laws mandatory across the country or11:14
whether the big food industries win11:16
their lawsuits, it really doesn't matter11:18
at this point because the cat is out of11:20
the bag and people are now starting to11:22
ask, "Wait, what is this in my food?"11:25
The blackbox movement isn't about the11:27
government telling you what to eat. It's11:30
about restoring the choice that was11:31
taken away from us for 70 years. But you11:34
know what doesn't get a blackbox warning11:36
label? the ribeye steak, the11:38
pasture-raised eggs, the blueberries.11:41
While big food corporations are trying11:43
to explain why their chemicals are safe11:45
for you and your family to consume, real11:48
food is just being real food. It's just11:50
one ingredient. It doesn't need a label.11:53
It has nothing to hide. We don't need to11:56
have these magnifying glass and black11:58
boxes on real food. Real health is built12:02
by stepping outside the system and just12:04
getting back to the basics. And if you12:07
enjoyed this video, I know you're going12:08
to be curious about how AI is impacting12:11
our food and the food products being12:13
produced. I'll leave that video right12:15
here. Don't be silly.
Subscribe to Lily12:18
and I hope you have a happy day.
❖
❖
❖